The StarPhoenix has generally expressed the view
that Sambasivam's candidacy stinks. injusticebusters received
a copy of a letter Jacob Zunti wrote to the StarPhoenix in support
of Sambasivam. In the interests of free speech, we are publishing
this letter. We are sorry Mr. Zunti thinks that by opposing Sam
as a fitting candidate for public office, we are being unfair
to men. We certainly see Sambasivam as an individual who is in
no way representative of anyone but himself, nevermind a whole
gender.
A reply to a note by Randy Burton in the Stupid Kleenix.(May 27, 1999)
I know what you think of Sam Sambasivam, but will his opponent
be
better?
I honestly believe that in some aspects, particularly domestic
violence,
and custody law, the legal system is unfair to men, that Canada's
criminal harassment law is very unfair to anyone who happens to
be
charged under it - men are in the main charged - and that you
are doing
good for trying to make the police and prosecutors in this province
accountable. I also look to you as an ally to help confront the
law and
order agenda that is sweeping our land and facilitating our
fascification.
. . -----------------
Just because you may be a stick in the mud, don't assume the
rest of the
electorate will be. A criminal conviction 10 years in the past
shouldn't
be a bar to running for public office, nor should it be a bar
for
winning. The sad plight of the Saskatchewan PC's isn't instructive
in
the least since their crimes were committed while in office.
In fact, it would be rather refreshing to see someone who has
seen the
justice system operate from the other side elected. Such an individual
could certainly add a counter-perspective to the mantra of the
priviledged who generally become our MLA's and MP's: that all
our
social problems can be solved with more or harsher laws...
This mantra is helping to make Canada and Saskatchewan more and
more
repressive, has lead to incarceration rates that appall Europeans,
and
is actively promoted and fostered by the mainstream media's crime
pornography.
I myself prefer Sambasivam to his opponent, who has probably
never seen
or known hardship in her life, and
who, like the poverty pimps in Saskatoon Communities for Children
actively promotes the establishment line that pimps and johns,
as
opposed to poverty and the unjust distribution of wealth, are
responsible for Saskatoon's prostitution and child prostitution
problems.
Lastly, someone with a criminal record ten years in the past
that isn't
fraud related, probably isn't any less likely to tell the truth
than
someone who has no record, and is probably more likely to tell
the truth
than some of the sensationalizing reporters the Star Phoenix employs...
whose motiviation appears to be the publication of stories that
will
sell great numbers of papers for Conrad Black while not rocking
any
apple carts... and whose commitment to publishing the truth appears
something less than wholehearted.
Sincerely yours
Jacob Zunti
Until this matter is settled,
injusticebusters will publish any opinion pieces submitted on
this subject. Back to Sam
Sambasivam page.
home | dedication | bad cop | defamatory libel demo | Martensville | court menu |free speech and the U. S. first amendment | Saskatchewan Injustice System | Disclosure and Saskatchewan Justice | Fighting back with Rick |Free speech and drugs with Sheila | Juries 1998 | injusticebusters t-shirts and hats | Covering up with Qunney and Dueck | Brian Dueck's Crimes 1 | Brian Dueck's Crimes 2 | Rants | Gallery Injustice | Good crowns, bad crowns . . .| RCMP Spies | New York City Street people under seige
