|
More sermonettes on
sidebar
Sermonette:
October, 2003
Just following orders:
Adolf Eichmann would seem to be the mentor for Saskatchewan politicians,
crown attorneys and police.
I thought
they were supposed to be taking their orders from us! This is
a democracy after all . . . or is it?

I had occasion
to watch a biography of Adolf Eichmann this week-end. He was
the prominent Nazi who escaped the Nuremberg trials in 1947-48
and, tracked down in Argentina, was taken to Israel where he
was tried and found guilty of crimes against humanity and hanged.
Throughout his trial, he claimed to have been "just following
orders" as had his predecessors. The diligence with which
he followed his orders -- the supervision of the deportation
of over 300,000 Jews -- and the confiscation of all their property
-- and then his part in devising "The Final Solution"
which was the efficient scheme for killing huge numbers of people
quickly and making money from every single part of their bodies
and their lives which could be salvaged -- and his coldbloodedness
have been the subject of much literary and psychological speculation
over the years. He acknowledged his role in the genocide and
saw nothing wrong with it. He withstood four weeks of intensive
cross-examination from survivors of those he had helped kill
-- without bending.
The Klassen/Kvello
civil trial, which now awaits a judgment, showed in 2003 how
stubborn is a certain mindset. Superintendent Dueck, Matthew
Miazga and Sonja Hansen all gave variations of the "just
following orders" defence. They were neither apologetic
nor did they show any shame. They withstood several days of cross-examination.
Hansen had one emotional outburst where she claimed to have been
affected by the psychic pain she witnessed young Michelle Ross
go through. Hansen's flash of pity for Michelle crying on the
stand did not extend to removing her from the clutches of her
brother, who was routinely raping her and her sister. But it
was not my job to place the children, she said.
Doing our jobs,
following procedures, not my job. This is the civil service of
the 21st century.
In their final
arguments, both defence lawyers urged the court to blame the
children. "It was not our clients who manufactured these
stories," they said. "It was the Ross children."
I don't know
how those attending the Nuremberg trials, or Eichmann's trial,
responded to the defence lawyers who distanced their clients
from the holocaust. I do know that the defences chosen by these
respondents in 2003 caused me concern and alarm. The leap from
"Believe the children" to "Blame the children"
seemed crass, even from this lot. But then, one should not be
surprised when only short months ago, a Queen's Bench judge in
Tisdale allowed that grown
men had been tricked and seduced by a twelve year old girl.
We all know
children who are engaging, who tell tall tales, who have imaginary
friends, who imagine the heroes of their bedtime stories or Saturday
morning cartoons really exist. Some of us were those children.
Now the Ross children were not especially imaginative. Or convincing,
for that matter. Michael had early on been busted by social workers
who wrote on his file that he told lies and this was communicated
to Anita Klassen when she and her husband agreed to foster the
children when Michael was 8. (Dale and Anita had specifically
told Social Services they did NOT want children who had been
sexually abused. We know for sure that they Margaret
Graham Woloshyn
had suspected they were sexually abused before they placed them.
) Dale and Anita thought they could handle lying and all evidence
shows they gave it a good shot. It is unlikely that Michael cleaned
up his act and became such a cunning conniver within three years
that he was able to convince a several educated and experienced
adults that he was telling the truth about orgies he had witnessed
and participated in at the Klassen households. The adults who
claim to have believed him chose to use his stories, and use
the "believe the children" line in a protocol and spin
themselves several days/weeks/years of lucrative work.
The human race
is in disrepute.
Not that we
have ever been that reputable. Our living memories are littered
with examples of just how little separates us from the Barbarians.
Terry Hinz
testified at the Klassen/Kvello trial that he felt he had been
transported back to 17th century Salem, Massechussets. According
to Arthur Miller's play, The Crucible, based largely on the actual
transcripts, this ws a case where some girls explained their
lascivious behavior by blaming it on witches in the community.
The trials were not fair or logical by any standards -- hold
her head under water and if she drowns, she's innocent. If she
does not drown, she is clearly a witch. Miller wrote this during
the Joseph McCarthy communist witch hunts of the 1950s. It is
a play which sheds light on many kinds of witch-hunts. At least
it shows us how to recognize them when they are happening. Stopping
them would seem to be a much more daunting task. --Sheila
Steele, November 17, 2003
|
Truth can never be
told so as to be understood, and not be believ'd.
William Blake, The Proverbs of Hell
Truth suppress'd, whether
by courts or crooks, will find an avenue to be told. Sheila Steele, injusticebusters.com
If you hold the mouth
of Truth, It will burst out its rib-cage. Somali proverb
Truth crushed to earth
will rise again. --William Cullen Bryant
- Who we
are:
Publisher Sheila
Steele
- Co-founder: Richard Klassen
New:
injusticebustersblog. Participate!
Our activism
contributed greatly to the good vibes which happened around the
civil trial.
Index
to the stories on this website
This is not
regularly updated so if you are looking for a particular story
and you have a name or keyword, please use the site search engine(at
the bottom of the page) which IS regularly updated
Index to Saskatoon Police stories
This is a pretty good scrapbook
for the 1998-2002 period.
- More Sermonettes
-
- early commentaries
mixed in with news reports
2001
- January: Legal Treachery to keep Dueck's lies safe
- September: Hatchen and Munson trial
2002
March, 2002 -- Gay Bashing still a legal sport in Saskatoon
-- Even when it turns to murder
- First conscious
sermonettes
- 2003
-
- Feb.
1: Where we stand
- Feb.
15, 2003: Has Saskatchewan
learned anything?
- March
1: Connecting the dots
- March
23, 2003: From Micro
to Macro
- March
25, 2003: About libel and malice
- March
27 : Gangs of Saskatoon:
the police and prison guards
- April
28, 2003: The Naked
Truth
- May 5: How
low will they go?
- May
15, 2003: Come clean
Calvert, Cline!
- May
30: Still smearing
Milgaard - defamation is alive and well on the lawn of the Regina
legislature and Precendent has been set as we reclaim our institutions
- June
11, 2003: --Eric Cline
carries on a corrupt tradition
- Nov
7: Courage -- the only
reward is justice
- November
20: Just following
orders
- November
24: Mayor Atchison,
community policing and graffiti
- November
25: Michael Jackson
- November
30: Corrupt officials
must be severely punished: otherwise they just keep on putting
the administration of justice in disrepute!
- December
1:
Christmas comes early for injustice warriors
- December
4:
Wide open Saskatchewan?
- December
16:
Crawling through the tunnel of justice since 1991
- December
24:
The Crown keeps right on breaking the law
- December
30:
Who will
find justice under their tree?
-
- 2004
-
- January
1. 2004: Unprecedented
publicity and Happy New Year
- January
8, 2004:
Malice still afoot
- January 10, 2004: Shame and mugshots
- January 14, 2004: Telling more truth about the undefamable:
McKillop and Quennell, the static duo
- January 17, 2004:
Fifth Estate returns and A working class hero is something to
be
- January 22,23, 2004: Justice is still prevailing
-- it is just taking longer and Bits
and pieces are now coming together to tell the story of the century
- January 27, 2004:
Telling the truth about the undefamable, restoring reputations
to the defamed.
- February 5, 2004:
Negotiations and strategies: getting an intransigent government
to remedy its damage
- February 10, 2004: How many lawyers does it take to ruin a province?
and Lawyer
continues to treat people's lives as a cruel game: monopoly?
- Febrary 16, 2004: Calvert is not King Arthur
- March 29, 2004: Counting down to the damages trial
- April 16, 2004: The internet, the courts and now the
movies -- We will so what it takes to get justice
- May 1, 2004: If
Frank Quennell is any example of what former Justice Minister
Chris Axworthy called "evolving," Saskatchewan is ready
to kiss justice good-bye!
- May 27, 2004: Some observations on Saskatchewan and justice
- June 7, 2004:Media coverage of Monique Turenne's story illustrates
journalistic laziness
- June 8:, 2004 -- The police not only failed to serve
and protect Don and Lorna Smith and their children but set them
up for false charges and community shunning
- September 2, 2004: A tale of three cops: Dueck, Gobeil
and Schinkel -- with an update on how they get away with criminal
obstruction of justice
- November, 2004: Wilfred Hathway, Atif Rafay and Sebastian
Burns -- RCMP stings offensive to community standards
- November 11, 2004: Rogue Platoon? Identifying the rotten apples in Saskatoon
Police Service and why we need a full public inquiry into our
whole justice system
- November 28, 2004: Can
Justice Minister Quennell take a few more steps? The Prosecutors'
office is still harbouring crowns who put the administrative
of justice in disrepute
- November 12, 2004: Saskatchewan Justice in chaos: The
Stonechild report suggests it is.
- November 28, 2004: The price for being a good judge or
a good prosecutor
- December
30:
When the government interferes
with the judiciary, we know a Police State is a dangerous possibility
(The government appeal of the Klassen/Kvello decision)
-
- 2005
-
- Jan 1, 2005: Chewed up digested and spit out
- Jan.
5, 2005:
More on chief Sabo
- February
18, 2005:
Tunnel vision: Darren Koehn, Wilf Hathway and Leon Walchuk
- March 2: Fixing the system: Time to quit talking and
implement previous commission recommendations
- March 19, 2005 : Injustice as ShowBiz
|