|
Update
on wrongful convictions in Canada, October, 2004 | Truscott
will have to wait some more | Ronald
Dalton | Greg Parsons
| Randy Druken | Tom
Sophonow | David
Milgaard | Donald
Marshall Jr. | Jason Dix
| Jerome
Kennedy | Greg
Parsons starved into settlement |
 January 25, 2005: The
Federal government released the first
national examination of the reasons for so many wrongful convictions
in Canada.
This should be required reading for every prosecutor, cop and
criminal defence lawyer in the country. News reports
Judge
Baynton's decision in Klassen/Kvello case | 2004
sessions of Lamer Inquiry
<
< < Previous
| > > > continued
Lamer Inquiry:
Nfld
Wrongfully convicted
man storms out of inquiry
Canadian Press, May. 11
2004
ST. JOHN'S, Nfld. - A Newfoundland
man wrongfully convicted of his mother's murder stormed out of
a public inquiry into the case Tuesday, as the prosecutor who
sent him to prison recounted her version of the trial.
Gregory Parsons said it was
difficult for him to sit through the testimony of Catherine Knox,
who successfully prosecuted him for second-degree murder 10 years
ago.
"She apologized yesterday
and today she's passing off all the responsibility on myself
and my lawyer," Parsons said outside the hearing room where
commissioner Antonio Lamer is probing three cases of wrongful
conviction in Newfoundland.
Parsons accused the former
prosecutor of putting on a show for the commission.
"This is not the woman
who was the prosecutor at my trial, (this woman) with her soft-spoken
voice and the sobby eyes," he said.
Knox was the sole prosecutor
at Parsons 1993 trial, which took place over the course of six
months and eventually heard from about 140 witnesses.
In the end Parsons was found
guilty and given a life sentence. He served just six weeks in
1994 before he was granted bail pending an appeal.
Parsons was later exonerated
by DNA evidence and was formally acquitted in 1998. A childhood
friend has since pleaded guilty to the crime.
During sometimes emotional
testimony, Knox has had trouble recalling exact events that took
place a decade ago.
As the inquiry probes every
detail of the investigation and prosecution, Knox has repeatedly
admitted that she would do many things differently now.
But all of that is with the
benefit of hindsight, she testified.
And while mistakes were made,
they were made in good faith, believing they were the right thing
to do, she told commissioner Antonio Lamer.
"It was my responsibility
to present all of the evidence ... the good, the bad and the
indifferent," said Knox, who now practices law in Saskatchewan.
Despite the terrible outcome,
she said she was fair.
"At the end of the day
it was not for me to decide the truthfulness," Knox testified.
"That was for the judge and, ultimately, the jury, properly
instructed by him on the law."
Knox admitted she feels she
is on the defensive about her handling of the case, one of three
before the commission.
The commission has already
heard from Ronald Dalton, who spent nearly nine years in prison
for his wife's murder before the province's Appeal Court overturned
the conviction. Dalton was acquitted at a new trial.
Later this year the inquiry
will look at the case of Randy Druken, who was convicted of the
1993 murder of his girlfriend, Brenda Marie Young, largely on
the testimony of a jailhouse informant who has since recanted.
The Crown eventually stayed the charges.
Although he has long demanded
a public inquiry into the cases, the proceedings have clearly
been difficult for Parsons, whose wife tried to comfort him Tuesday
as transcripts of trial testimony were read out.
As he returned to the hearing
later, Parsons said he holds Knox largely responsible for his
ordeal.
"She should have had the
legal knowledge to know that there was no case there," he
said. "I was convicted of second-degree murder and sentenced
to life without one piece of evidence -- not one, not a hair,
not a fibre, not a fingerprint -- and I've got to listen to this
person in there vilify me once again."
© Copyright 2004
Bell Globemedia Inc.
Prosecutor apologizes
for wrongful conviction
CANADIAN PRESS, May 10,
2004.
ST. JOHN'S - The former Crown
attorney who prosecuted Greg Parsons for the murder of his mother
apologized today for her role in the wrongful conviction.
In hindsight, there were many
things she would have done differently, Catherine Knox told a
public inquiry examining the cases of three men who were wrongly
convicted of murder in Newfoundland.
"I accept that Greg Parsons
was wrongfully convicted of this offence and that he is innocent
of causing the death of his mother," Knox said as Parsons
stared from the front row of public seating.
"I regret that I was part
of a process and a system that led to his wrongful conviction.
I apologize to Mr. Parsons, to his family, and to all others
who were affected by this tragic outcome."
Parsons was the sole prosecutor
of the case that sent Parsons to prison for the 1991 murder of
his mother, Catherine Carroll.
Parsons served six weeks in
prison in 1994 before he was granted bail pending an appeal.
He was later exonerated by DNA evidence and was formally acquitted
in 1998. A childhood friend has since pleaded guilty to the crime.
Inquiry commissioner Antonio
Lamer heard Knox explain how the case had been handled by two
previous Crown attorneys before it arrived on her desk in 1993.
Knox testified that she began
to review the case about a month before the trial began in September
of that year.
"In hindsight and with
the knowledge I have now . . . I know that it wasn't adequate
time," she told Lamer.
Still, Knox said she felt prepared
as the trial began, even though it was a troubling case that
relied on circumstantial evidence.
"When you're dealing with
a circumstantial case as a Crown, you don't have the comfort
of having something that you can hang your hat on, like a confession,
an eyewitness, or something that will allow you the comfort of
knowing you're probably right," she said.
"We didn't have the smoking
gun."
But Knox, by then an eight-year
veteran of the Crown attorney office, said she felt the case
was strong enough to proceed.
She said she questioned investigators
on every piece of evidence and asked them to gather statements
from witnesses even as the trial proceeded.
The inquiry has heard from
many of the Royal Newfoundland Constabulary officers involved
in the investigation. They have testified about a lack of training
and leadership, and their general inexperience at the time.
But Knox said that didn't appear
to be the case during the trial.
"I dealt with a confident
group of men who had confidence in their abilities and they portrayed
to me and to the jury their confidence," she told the inquiry.
Knox admitted to making mistakes
but said they were made in good faith.
"Had I had to do it over
again I would have proceeded differently, but that's with the
benefit of knowing we were wrong," said the lawyer, who
at times during her testimony appeared to wipe tears from her
eyes.
She is now in private practice
in Saskatchewan.
Parsons is one of three cases
under scrutiny at the inquiry.
The commission has already
heard from Ronald Dalton, who spent nearly nine years in prison
for his wife's murder before the province's Appeal Court overturned
the conviction. Dalton was acquitted at a new trial.
Later this year the inquiry
will look at the case of Randy Druken, who was convicted of the
1993 murder of his girlfriend, Brenda Marie Young, largely on
the testimony of a jailhouse informant who has since recanted.
The Crown eventually stayed the charges.
Prosecutor apologizes
for wrongful conviction
Tuesday, May. 11, 2004
St. John's -- A prosecutor
who put a Newfoundland man behind bars on a charge of murdering
his mother has apologized, for the first time, for her role in
his wrongful conviction.
Catherine Knox offered her
apology yesterday at a public inquiry into three cases of wrongful
convictions in Newfoundland.
She says she accepts that Gregory
Parsons was wrongfully convicted of killing his mother. CP
© 2004 Bell Globemedia
Publishing Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Parsons takes
aim at police, prosecutors
CBC, Dec 9 2003 05:51
PM NST
ST. JOHN'S -The first of the
Royal Newfoundland Constabulary officers who was on the scene
the night Catherine Carroll was murdered in 1991 took the stand
Tuesday at the Lamer Inquiry.
'I've never taken a specific
course in major crime or homicide related course' Roger
Kennedy, a constable in 1991
Commissioner Antonio Lamer is investigating the wrongful conviction
of Gregory Parsons Carroll's son.
Speaking from the stand, Sgt.
Roger Kennedy said members of the police force received little
training to handle murders years ago.
"I've never taken a specific
course in major crime or homicide related course," he told
the inquiry.
Kennedy, a constable in 1991,
was the first officer on the scene of the murder.
"I'm going to try to show
that this investigation was a rudderless ship," said Jerome
Kennedy, Parsons' lawyer, who added that provincial police didn't
have proper resources to conduct a major homicide investigation.
Sgt. Derek Tilley was next
to take the stand at the inquiry. As a constable during the murder
investigation, Tilley had only six months experience when he
was called to take pictures and examine potential pieces of evidence.
"I felt very uncomfortable
with what I was observing at the scene. It was probably my level
of expertise," Tilley said.
Parsons and his lawyer aren't
just upset with the police. Former members of the Crown prosecutors
office are also scheduled to testify at the Lamer Inquiry.
At beginning of proceedings
Tuesday morning, Parsons read a prepared statement about how
his life has been affected. As he left the stand, he pointed
his finger at former Crown prosecutor Kathy Knox and said, "I
hope you get the blame."
DNA evidence collected in 1991
became crucial to police years later when authorities finally
convicted the man who did stab Catherine Carroll to death
Brian Doyle, who pleaded guilty to second-degree murder this
year.
Gregory Parsons in his own words - Listen
to Gregory Parsons' statement at the Lamer Inquiry (runs 4:30)
Copyright © 2004 Canadian
Broadcasting Corporation - All Rights Reserved
Restore faith
in justice system, Parsons says
STJOHNS.CBC.CA, Dec 9 2003
ST. JOHN'S -Gregory Parsons
has made a statement at the Lamer Inquiry looking into his wrongful
conviction of murder.
'If anything comes from this
inquiry, I hope it's change' Gregory Parsons
He asked to speak as phase two of the inquiry into the province's
justice system began Tuesday morning.
"If anything comes from
this inquiry, I hope it's change," Parsons said.
He was convicted of the 1991
death of his mother Catherine Carroll, who was stabbed repeatedly
while in her home. Parsons told the inquiry he has had a difficult
time trying to live a normal life, despite his eventual exoneration.
"When your five-year-old
child looks at you and says 'I know why you were in jail daddy,
because you killed your mother' - it makes you angry," he
said.
Parson's childhood friend Brian
Doyle pleaded guilty this year to committing the murder.
The inquiry will hear testimony
from the police officers who investigated the crime; it will
also hear from former Crown prosecutors.
Commissioner Antonio Lamer
is also looking into the cases of two other men, Ronald Dalton
and Randy Druken, who were also wrongly convicted of murder.
Inquiry begins to
plumb wrongful conviction
STJOHNS.CBC.CA, Dec 9 2003
ST. JOHN'S -Members of the
Royal Newfoundland Constabulary and the provincial justice system
will be the focus of an inquiry for the next six weeks.
'The investigation was conducted
totally improperly' lawyer Jerome Kennedy
Phase two of the Lamer inquiry begins Tuesday, looking into the
arrest, conviction, and appeal of Gregory Parsons. The St. John's
man was convicted of killing his mother Catherine Carroll
she had been stabbed 53 times.
DNA evidence later cleared
Parsons and the province exonerated him. Parsons eventually received
compensation for his wrongful conviction, and the government
promised to review what happened. It appointed retired chief
justice of the Supreme Court of Canada Antonio Lamer to head
the inquiry.
Various members of the Royal
Newfoundland Constabulary, including Ab Singleton, the lead investigator;
will appear before the inquiry, as the public hears how Parsons
came to be blamed.
"There were various police officers acting and making decisions
without informing other main players in the investigation,"
says Jerome Kennedy, one of Parsons' lawyers. "That will
simply support, in my view, that the investigation was conducted
totally improperly."
Past members of the Crown prosecutor's
office will also testify:
Wayne Gorman, who is now a
judge in Corner Brook
Colin Flynn, another provincial court judge
Bernard Coffey, a private lawyer in St. John's
Parsons' lawyer says many people
played a role in his client's conviction.
"It was a team effort,"
says Kennedy.
"Once this starts to come
out it's going to establish that it wasn't only the police or
the involvement of the police that led to this wrongful conviction."
Earlier this year, a court
sentenced Brian Doyle, who pleaded guilty to second-degree murder
for the brutal 1991 murder of Catherine Carroll.
- Williams changes
powers of inquiry
- Review of wrongful murder
convictions gets increased scope in Newfoundland
By KIRK MAKIN, Globe
and Mail JUSTICE REPORTER, Oct. 28, 2003
Newfoundland premier-designate
Danny Williams has agreed to change the powers of a continuing
inquiry to enable the probe to uncover the root causes of three
wrongful murder convictions.
Announcing the move before
he even takes office, Mr. Williams may have defused a controversy
surrounding the inquiry by former chief justice of Canada Antonio
Lamer.
"My primary objective
is to restore the public's confidence in the judicial system,"
Mr. Williams said in a news release. "That can only occur
through a thorough and proper commission of inquiry."
The announcement was enthusiastically
received by Jerome Kennedy, a lawyer for two of the men -- Ronald
Dalton and Greg Parsons.
"We have to find out how
three men were wrongfully convicted of murder in a province this
size in a period of six years," Mr. Kennedy said yesterday.
"Mr. Williams's approach appears to be that if there is
a problem, let's identify it and correct it. At this point we
cannot ask for more." He said that Bill Collins, a lawyer
for the third man -- Randy Druken -- echoed his views.
"The premier's comments
and the fact that he could find the time to deal with this issue
within a week of coming off a long election campaign gives me
great hope that, with leadership like this, steps can be taken
to restore faith in the justice system," Mr. Kennedy said.
Shortly before the inquiry
commenced last month, Mr. Kennedy wrote an angry brief to Mr.
Lamer to say that his inquiry could become a "whitewash"
aimed at shielding those who are to blame.
Mr. Kennedy accused the province
of cunningly neutering the commissioner. He said the inquiry
had no hope of meeting the standards set by previous inquiries
into the wrongful convictions of Donald Marshall, Guy Paul Morin
and Thomas Sophonow.
His chief complaint was that
the terms of reference prevent Mr. Lamer from treating all three
as wrongful convictions, and impeded him from making recommendations
which go to the heart of systemic failures.
Mr. Kennedy said he had pinned
his hopes on Mr. Williams winning the provincial election. As
a successful lawyer, he said, Mr. Williams knew first-hand the
emotional and psychological costs of being charged with murder.
Mr. Dalton spent eight years
in prison for murdering his wife before he was acquitted at a
retrial. Forensic evidence pointed toward her having choked on
cereal rather than having been strangled.
Mr. Parsons was acquitted of
murdering his mother after DNA evidence showed another man was
the killer. Mr. Druken's 1995 conviction for murdering his girlfriend
was stayed by the Crown two years ago after the Newfoundland
Court of Appeal ordered a retrial because a key witness had lied.
Mr. Kennedy said the province
has yet to concede the "factual innocence" of Mr. Dalton
and Mr. Druken -- notwithstanding the fact that Mr. Dalton was
acquitted by a jury on the basis that his wife died accidentally,
and a complete absence of evidence linking Mr. Druken to the
murder of his girlfriend.
Rather than providing an opportunity
for the three men to have their names cleared publicly, he said,
establishing their innocence would not even be a part of Mr.
Lamer's mandate.
Mr. Lamer has already raised
some questions about his terms of reference, and Mr. Williams
encouraged him to raise more.
Mr. Kennedy alleged that the
previous government was hoping to keep a lid on information that
could increase its liability in lawsuits the three men have launched.
© 2003 Bell Globemedia
Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Lamer rejects call to
quit inquiry
Last Updated Wed Oct 1 18:26:37
2003
ST. JOHN'S-- An inquiry into wrongful convictions
in Newfoundland and Labrador will continue after Antonio Lamer
rejected a call to step down.
Lamer, former chief justice
of the Supreme Court of Canada, was asked on Wednesday to stop
heading up the inquiry.
Gerry O'Brien, a lawyer for
one of the witnesses, had asked Lamer to remove himself from
the inquiry because he believed there was a conflict between
his former job with the Supreme Court and the inquiry.
After a short recess in proceedings,
Lamer rejected O'Brien's application.
The inquiry is looking into
why Ronald Dalton sat in prison for more than eight years waiting
for his appeal on a murder conviction.
Lamer was on the Supreme Court
in 1999 when the top court dealt with the Dalton case, and Lamer
read a document that discussed the delay.
The country's top court refused
to hear a Crown appeal related to the case.
But Lamer ruled that the inquiry
is looking at different questions than he dealt with before,
so his prior knowledge won't colour his determinations.
The inquiry is also looking
into the wrongful convictions of Randy Druken and Gregory Parsons.
Written by CBC News Online
staff
First phase of Nfld.
wrongful convictions inquiry hears from last witness
Tuesday, September 30, 2003
ST. JOHN'S, Nfld. (CP) - Ronald
Dalton was acquitted of his wife's murder after he spent nearly
nine years in prison and now it seems the legal profession is
on trial at a public inquiry examining the delay.
Defence lawyers, justice officials
and court staff have been called to account at the inquiry, which
is also investigating two other cases of wrongful conviction
in the province. "There has to be accountability,"
said Jerome Kennedy, the lawyer who eventually argued Dalton's
appeal and the final witness in the first phase of the inquiry.
"If the system is to work
properly, all participants have to be accountable, be it the
police, Crown counsel, defence counsel, judges," Kennedy
said after his testimony.
Inquiry commissioner Antonio
Lamer heard that while Dalton's notice of appeal was filed within
weeks of his December 1989 conviction, no further documents were
sent to the court until a frustrated Dalton filed his own documents
in October 1996.
Lamer, a former Supreme Court
of Canada justice, heard that four different lawyers spent years
arguing over funding with the province's Legal Aid Commission
after Dalton exhausted his own savings.
The commission heard that Dalton's
first lawyer, David Eaton, resigned without explanation in August
1992. He apparently did no work on the case for for 2? years.
Dalton enlisted another lawyer,
David Day, in 1993.
Four years later, Dalton fired
Day, who was struggling with stress-related illness as a result
of his work at the public inquiry into sex abuse at the Mount
Cashel orphanage in St. John's.
While he had researched the
case and pursued forensic evidence, Day hadn't filed any documents
in four years.
Day's junior partner, Sandra
Burke, testified Friday that she provided Day with a draft document
by August 1994.
Burke said she was "absolutely
horrified" in October 1996 when she found out Dalton had
filed the draft document himself, repeated letters to Day having
gone unanswered.
Despite assurances from Day,
by January 1997 nothing had been done, she said.
Burke contacted Dalton.
"I essentially told him
that he should get another lawyer," Burke testified Friday.
Then she contacted Kennedy
and asked him to take on the case. Within a year, the appeal
was heard.
Dalton is suing Eaton and Day
as well as the province and the medical examiner who testified
at his first trial.
Over much of the next year,
Lamer will also hear about the cases of Randy Druken and Gregory
Parsons.
Druken was convicted of the
1993 murder of his girlfriend, Brenda Marie Young, largely on
the testimony of a jailhouse informant.
He spent almost six years in
prison before he was granted an appeal in 1999.
The Crown consented to a new
trial after the informant said police had pressured him to make
a false statement. The Crown eventually stayed the charges.
Parsons was 19 in 1991 when
he found his mother stabbed to death in her St. John's home.
In 1994, a jury convicted him
of second-degree murder. He served six weeks before he was granted
bail pending an appeal.
Parsons was later exonerated
by DNA evidence and was formally acquitted in 1998. A former
friend has since pleaded guilty to the crime.
At the end of the inquiry,
Lamer can make recommendations to avoid similar cases in the
future.
There have already been changes,
Kennedy said.
The commission has heard that
rules limiting the amount of time lawyers have to follow-up appeals
were rarely enforced.
"The rules of court are
very rigidly enforced over there now and if there are any delays,
counsel are called before the court and forced to address the
issue," Kennedy said outside the hearing room.
The commissioner can also recommend
compensation for Dalton and Druken. Last year Parsons accepted
an apology and compensation from the province.
Dalton, the first witness at
the inquiry, sat through the testimony of all the others.
"It's nice to have some
of this stuff made public (but) there are no big revelations
in it for me," he said Friday.
Case overwhelming for
lawyer
By BONNIE BELEC, The Telegram
, September 26, 2003
A 35-year-law veteran admitted
Thursday that working on Ronald Dalton's murder appeal was like
trying to push an elephant up the stairs.
"There came a point in
time during my representation, and I can only describe it by
quoting a line in a song by Bon Jovi, 'pushing an elephant up
the stairs'. Between illness and frustration I wasn't getting
the elephant up the stairs," David Day testified at a commission
of inquiry.
Dalton's lawyer Bob Simmonds
asked him why he didn't just walk away from the case with the
realization that he wasn't doing Dalton any good.
"I couldn't withdraw because
I denied that I was that ill. I was so far along with the file
I had to press forward. In hindsight, I should have said I can't
continue," said Day, who is well-known for his work on the
Hughes Commission.
Dalton, a former bank manager,
was convicted in 1989 of the second-degree murder of his wife,
Brenda, and sentenced to life in prison with no eligibility for
parole for 10 years.
An appeal was launched immediately,
but the 47-year-old spent eight-years in a maximum security prison
before the file found its way to the Court of Appeal in 1997
with lawyer Jerome Kennedy's assistance.
Dalton's conviction was subsequently
overturned by the appellate court in 1998 and a new trial ordered.
He was acquitted in June 2000.
Day, who became involved in
Dalton's appeal in 1993, has been testifying for the past two
days before the commission of inquiry headed up by Antonio Lamer,
a former chief justice of the Supreme Court of Canada.
Day has told Lamer that while
he was contacted by Dalton in 1993 to represent him at his appeal,
an agreement for legal aid funding wasn't secured until Nov.
22, 1994 - due in part to wrangling over appropriate funds.
But Day also told the inquiry
that throughout the period he represented Dalton, November 1994
to 1997, he experienced severe ill health which at times impaired
his efficiency, a condition he did not address with Dalton.
One of those bouts caused a
delay in legal aid issuing the certificate.
Day sent Dalton a solicitor/client
agreement April 28, 1994, which Dalton returned days later with
words of encouragement contained in his letter that after five
years his appeal was making progress.
However, two months later,
the legal aid commission wrote Day to determine if he would be
accepting the certificate.
Simmonds pointed out that correspondence
shows the commission was waiting for Day's response.
Day said he was waiting for
them and that there had been a misunderstanding.
By June 9, 1994 the misunderstanding
was resolved, however, Simmonds said, the certificate was still
not issued because Day had not asked legal aid to issue it.
"We're now approaching
another year since he wrote you, and all that's holding it up
is a phone call for the certificate, which is crucial to get
the file started. You could have phoned the commission and had
it sent over to your office by courier in 10 minutes," suggested
Simmonds.
Day agreed.
"I took ill in June 1994,
I ultimately was in hospital the summer of 1994, I was sufficiently
rehabilitated by November 1994. Yes, somebody could have called
and said send the certificate to us, but I wouldn't have been
there to honour it," Day explained.
"I'm not discounting your
illness, but I put to you you knew the only thing from continuing
the deal was the signing of the certificate," said Simmonds.
Unquestionably, Day said.
Simmonds asked Day if he though
it appropriate to call for the certificate and get his associate
working on the appeal, in light of his illness and the fact Dalton
was still in jail.
"My preoccupation was
myself. I should have called the secretary to have legal aid
issue the certificate, but I wouldn't be there to honour it.
I should have called Dalton. Why didn't I? I have pondered that.
When a person is ill you go into denial, refuse to believe your
health has interfered with your ability to complete work. My
hope was to be on the bridge to finish the job," Day told
the inquiry.
"I didn't notify him.
I believed in him and his case. I wanted to do it. I wanted to
solve it. I was wrong. I will add that what I just said applies
with equal force from November with respect to my ability to
live up to my responsibilities," he said.
Simmonds asked him why he didn't
get his associate Sandra Burke to work on the file.
"It is my responsibility
at the end of the day, when the inquiry looks at the delay, I
was responsible, not Ms. Burke," he said.
However, Simmonds noted in
the end Burke did do some work on the file and in fact prepared
a factum which she sent to Dalton in 1995, one year before Day
sent the exact same document - minus Burke's name and the date.
By the end of June 1994 there
was still no legal aid certificate.
Correspondence filed at the
inquiry revealed that in October 1994 legal aid, as well as Dalton,
was still left wondering what was going on with the file and
the certificate.
On Nov. 22, 1994, Day wrote
to legal aid: "this firm agrees, effective today, to accept
a certificate from the Newfoundland Legal Aid Commission to represent
Ronald Dalton on his appeal."
The certificate was issued
three days later and honoured by Day in January 1995.
Following the day's proceedings,
Simmonds said the issue with Day was not the time he spent on
the file, his research or even the money he spent out of his
own pocket, "it was his conduct or carriage of the file
did not produce any useful result, or a very limited result."
"He did not properly deal
with Mr. Dalton, he did not advise Mr. Dalton of relevant concerns
and issues which were retarding the progress of the file such
that, as we heard today, that he purposefully did not sign the
certificate from the period June 30 up until January the following
year he should have then reassessed his position but that went
on until finally out of absolute exasperation Mr. Dalton on April
3, 1997 contacted Mr. (Jerome) Kennedy," he said.
The inquiry continues today.
<
< < Previous
| > > > continued
|
