|
More
on Vancouver's criminal cops | Brian
Dueck in Saskatoon | Jeff Berg
| John Richardson |
Robert Woodward
Vancouver
cops face prosecution after brutalizing a 71 year old man, who
they saw swallowing a Tylenol pill in a private vehicle.
Cops violently hauled the disabled senior citizen out of the
car and tossed him against a wall, cutting his arm and causing
surgery scar to open. A Vancouver Sun report says of the
victim, Robert Woodward, "His (earlier) spinal injury was
so severe that he was paralysed from the waist down for 12 years
but taught himself to walk again..." ""I'm
just taking them (Tylenol) and wham - I'm against the wall,"
he recalled of the incident. The impact knocked out his
false teeth, he added...He asked for the officer's names and
badge numbers but was told, "It's none of your business."
He filed a police complaint the day of the incident and asked
the sergeant who took his complaint for the names and badge numbers
of the officers. "All he said is he would get in touch
with them," Woodward recalled...Vancouver police Constable
Anne Drennan said Woodward had not filed a formal complaint with
police...Drennan said the officers ran into Woodward the next
day and apologized to him. Woodward denies that happened."
Believe Woodward, because VPD is a pack of wild animals whose
savage members should be charged with Fraud everytime they cash
a pay cheque. Those worthless pigs unfound 19 out of every
20 crime complaints that their wage payers make, by right.
They make a paltry 7 arrests per pig per year, and most of these
are false.--from a visitor
Police Officers Face
Prosecution for Assaulting Senior Citizen
Press Advisory - For Immediate
Release
January 20, 2005
PIVOT Legal Society
Police Officers Face Prosecution
for Assaulting Senior Citizen
VANCOUVER - A senior criminal
defence lawyer is preparing to prosecute two Vancouver Police
officers for assaulting an elderly man in the Downtown Eastside.
Howard Rubin, a former Crown
prosecutor, is set to appear in Provincial Court at 222 Main,
on Monday, January 24, at 2:00 p.m. to begin proceedings against
the two officers. Rubin is acting on behalf of Robert Woodward,
a 71-year old senior citizen who lives in Surrey and does volunteer
work in the Downtown Eastside.
What makes this case special
is that a private citizen is acting as prosecutor, rather than
the Crown. Under the Criminal Code, individual citizens can initiate
criminal proceedings without the assistance of either the police
or the Crown. Rubin took up the case on the request of Pivot
Legal Society, an organization dedicated to improving the lives
of marginalized persons.
The private prosecution stems
from an incident on September 4, 2004. Woodward, who collects
toys to give to poor families, was in his car taking Tylenol
3. Woodward has a subscription for the pills because of chronic
pain, due to an industrial accident that paralyzed him for 12
years.
"I had put the Tylenols
in my mouth when someone grabbed my throat and shoulder and literally
dragged me out of the car," said Woodward. "There were
two officers. One slammed me into a wall face first, and yelled
'Spit it out!' When I spit out the pills, my teeth came out as
well."
Woodward suffered serious cuts
to his left hand and right shoulder, and his stomach started
to bleed from old injuries that split open. After the incident,
VPD officers Swanson and Whittaker refused to give their names
or badge numbers. Whittaker has since quit the VPD.
Woodward laid a complaint with
the Vancouver Police Department the same day, but nothing ever
happened. Since then, he tried six different times to get the
names of the officers. It was only when Pivot Legal Society demanded
the officer's names were they released.
"This case illustrates
how lack of proper oversight and a violent police culture puts
everyone in society at risk," said John Richardson, executive
director of Pivot Legal Society. "There is no public safety
without police accountability, not even for the elderly."
_________________
Further Comment:
John Richardson
(604) 417-6074
Howard Rubin
(604) 984-2030
PRIVATE PROSECUTIONS
BACKGROUNDER
Canadian criminal law is normally
enforced using a two-step process: The police first investigate
a crime, and then Crown prosecutors try the case in court. It
is a little known fact, however, that individual Canadians are
also authorized to initiate criminal proceedings, without involving
either the police or the Crown. This process, known as a private
prosecution, allows private individuals to act as criminal prosecutors.
Private prosecutions are not
a new phenomenon. From the early Middle Ages to the 17th century,
private prosecutions were the main way to enforce the criminal
law. Indeed, responsibility for preserving the peace and maintaining
the law generally rested with private citizens. Since that time,
the police and the Crown Counsel's office have assumed most of
the responsibilities for law enforcement. However, under the
common law in Canada, every person has the right to initiate
a private prosecution against an alleged offender in any matter
that constitutes a violation of the Criminal Code. Individuals
can also initiate private prosecutions to enforce a statute,
such as environmental legislation, that provides penalties for
the violations.
A private prosecution occurs
when an individual, or a group of individuals, gathers evidence
of a wrongdoing and swears an Information setting out the particulars
of the alleged crime. Rather than the police initiating charges,
as is normally the case, it is the individual who initiates criminal
proceedings in a private prosecution.
This is how the process works:
a.. Any person can go before a Justice of the Peace and
swear under oath that an illegal act has occurred. This process
is known as "Laying an Information." b.. A Justice
of the Peace who receives an Information must refer the matter
to a Provincial Court Judge. c.. The individual who has
laid the Information then appears before the Judge at a special
hearing. If the Judge is satisfied that there exists substantial
evidence that an offence has occurred, the Judge will issue a
summons and order the accused to answer to the charge in court.
d.. If the Judge allows the charge to proceed, the individual
(or their lawyer) can act as the prosecutor in conducting the
legal proceedings.
The right of an individual
to conduct a private prosecution is not unlimited. The Attorney
General has the ability to take over a private prosecution. If
the Attorney General decides that the prosecution is against
the public interest, it can be stopped. In some cases, the Attorney
General and the private prosecutor will work together, sharing
the responsibility.
If the accused is found guilty
as a result of the private prosecution, punishment and a criminal
record will follow in the same way as a prosecution by the Crown.
_________________
|
Truth can never be
told so as to be understood, and not be believ'd. William Blake, The Proverbs of Hell
Truth suppress'd, whether
by courts or crooks, will find an avenue to be told. Sheila Steele, injusticebusters.com
If you hold the mouth
of Truth, It will burst out its rib-cage. Somali proverb
Publisher : Sheila
Steele
Got something
to say about this or any other stories on this site? Go to injusticebustersblog Participate!
- injusticebusters
court advice :
- How to walk yourself through the justice system
-
- Why you should dump your preliminary hearing (written July 1998 and still valid)
-
- Sermonette:
The
Naked Truth -- (You
will find links to many more sermonettes in the sidebar on this
page
Another target
of Dueck's malice: : Wilf Hathway
Our activism
contributed greatly to the good vibes which happened around the
civil trial.
Index
to the stories on this website
This is not
regularly updated so if you are looking for a particular story
and you have a name or keyword, please use the site search engine(at
the bottom of the page) which IS regularly updated
Index to Saskatoon Police stories
This is a pretty good scrapbook
for the 1998-2002 period.

Inquiry into the malicious prosecution of David
Milgaard untanling 36 years of Saskatchewan police and Crown
misconduct: : Opening day 1 | 2
| 3 | 4
| 5 | 6
| 7 |
- Stephen
Williams: Canadian
writer subject to Stasi-like treatment by Canadian police
- Terry
Arnold: : Snitch a
suicide?
- RCMP
scenario stings: Brian
Hutchinson starts digging
- Gary
wells: Faulty eye-witness
testimony
- Tulia,
Texas
- Gilmer,
Texas
- Willie
Upshaw
- Wrongfully convicted in Canada
- Foster Parent false accusations
- Martensville
- Don
Smith obscenity trial: an obscene conviction
- James
Lockyer
- Hurricane
Carter
- Johnny Cochran speaks up for
Bill Sampson
- Vopnis
- Abdulai
Mohamed

The Terrible Story behind the Atif Rafay and
Sebastian Burns convictions

Trial
set for June 15
We
know part of this disclosure is a forged statement and perjured
affidavit from a Winnipeg cop
-
-
-
-

The
Crown is still fighting Fred Poirier -- and they are losing.
Secret Commissions Case from Northern B.C.
-
-
- 2005: In
the United States the proven wrongful convictions just keep coming
at us!
-
- Brandon Morin:
- Convicted in Oregon
- of rapes which did not happen
- This website has good information
about Measure 11 -- Oregon's Mandatory Sentencing requirements
which have been in place since 1994. In this case we see how
the combination of a flawed grand jury system and prosecutors
who seek not justice but convictions is a recipe for wrongful
convictions.
-
Canadians who
have been wrongfully convicted because of improper investigations
combined with zealous Crown
A round-up of wrongful convictions in Canada
- Robert
Baltovich
- Michael Burns
- Sebastian Burns
- Rodney
Cain
- Wilbert
Coffin
(hanged, 1953)
- Jason
Dix
- Jim
Driskell
- Jody
Druken
- Randy
Druken
- Hugues
Duguay
- Michel Dumont
- Peter
Frumusa
- Walter
Gillespie and Robert Mailman
- Clayton Johnson
- Yvonne Johnson
- Herman
Kaglik
- Darren
Koehn
- Kulaveeringsam
"Kulam" Karthiresu
- Stephen Leadbeater
- Donald Marshall
- Chris McCullough
- Michael
McTaggart
- Felix
Michaud
- David Milgaard
- Guy
Paul Morin
- Shannon
Murrin
- Jamie
Nelson
- Greg
Parsons
- Benoit Proulx
- Atif Rafay
- Louise
Reynolds
- Thomas
Sophonow
- Gary
Staples
- Billy
Taillefer
- Steven
Truscott
- Joe
Warren
- Leon
Walchuk
-
- AIDWYC
- Innocence Project (Canada)
- Innocence Project (U.S.)
- Northwest Law Center on Wrongful Convictions
-
- Kirstin Lobato
- Jeffrey
Scott Hornoff
- Willie
Upshaw
- Hurricane
Carter
- Guildford
4
- Birmingham
6
- Amirault
- Houston
- U.S. wrongful convictions:
Exonerateed
- Kirk
Bloodsworth
- Laurence
Adams
- Ludrate
Burton
- Stephen
Cowans
- Wilton
Dedge
- Albert
Johnson
- Kenneth
Marsh
- Dwayne
McKinney
- James Bernard Parker
- Peter
Reilly
- Peter
Rose
- Sylvester
Smith
- Clifford
St. Joseph
- John
Stoll
- Marty
Tankleff
- Wilton
Dedge
- Ray
Krone
-
- Still working on it:
- Dennis Deschaine
- Dennis
Perry
- Tim
Sandfort
-
-
|
Revitalizing the
archives
From 1998 until
2002, injusticebusters was in the throes of identity crisis.
What was it? What were we doing? We grappled with editorial policy
at the same time we were learning the nuts and bolts of building
and posting a website. Once we had a secure, paid site I had
full editorial control, although I talked regularly to Richard
Klassen who was forced to move his family several times and did
not always have access to the internet. Rick's pages: one | two
We posted our
earliest and later actions.
Early versions
of the site can be found on the Wayback Machine.
I began following
other threads to stories of police and prosecutorial misconduct
and the site's character took on another facet: a newsclipping
scrapbook where stories could live longer than they would in
print form. I also began picking up other stories of wrongfully
convicted people. It was an explosion. By 2003 there were over
700 pages. I also had contact with several other people (Don Smith, Leon Walchuk, Monique Turenne, the Vopnis) and kept these stories
going.
It was the
story of the Ross children's treatment at the hands of the Saskatchewan
government which grabbed the attention of The
Fifth Estate.
The civil claim (The $10M Lawsuit as we called it) was only mentioned
briefly at the end of their show which aired in November, 2000.
When Richard
Klassen began to make progress in bringing his civil claim to
court, the government and police defendants alleged he was breaking
the rules of court by publishing discovery material on the internet.
- MacNeil clinic (the document which started it all)
- The Thompson Papers
- Carol
Bunko-Ruys reports
This claim
was absolutely false. However, rather than risk being thrown
out of his civil claim, Klassen undertook before Judge Mona Dovall
to sever all ties with the website.
The court fights:
- Les
Perreaux report
- QB271
These pages have links which
lead to other pages from that era. Now that some of the dust has settled,
I have been going back through the material we had posted in
the early days. In the spirit of keeping the scrapbook alive,
I have been reformatting and placing links. The original material
remains intact. I hope the information, which chronicles our
struggle is useful to you.
The identity
crisis is over. We know who we are --Sheila Steele, March
28, 2005
|
-
Blogging
Blogging has been in the news.
It is the new, trendy thing with 40,000 new blogs being created
each day. I established a blog for this website last September
and it is now "taking off." These are a few of the
pages with ongoing discussions.
- Tasering Mary Lutz
- Saskatchewan Centenary
- Quint Blog discussion
- Rotten apples in the Saskatoon Police
- Blogging for choice
- Michael Cardamone witch hunt
- Implement recommendations of public
inquiries
- Stealing from the poor
- Vancouver's killer cops
- Tisdale rapists appeal
- Winnipeg police misdeeds
- Milgaard Inquiry
- Chief Sabo: can he be trusted?
- The Old Boys' Club Must Go!
- Vancouver activists
- John Hudak: Falsely accused mountie
- City of intolerance
- Constable Larry Lockwood: Exciteable!
- Eric Cline
This is a great way for like-minded
people to communicate and share our views. It is easier than
making a website and marginally more difficult than a forum.
People who want to contribute
simply have to punch the "comment" link and they will
be taken to a page with a box which allows them to write their
comment, preview and post it. It takes a while for the comment
to show up and some people get impatient and repost. That's fine,
I trash the duplicate posts and no harm done.
Please, please give it a try.
The internet is distinguished from other media in that it is
really and truly interactive. Blogging makes it possible to express
your viewpoint even if you don't have a computer. You can go
to the library or a friend's place or an internet cafe. Once
you've mastered the basics (and believe me, if I can do it, you
can do it) you will be participating in one of the most democratic
-- and potentially powerful -- media the world as we know it
has ever seen.
Come on. Don't be shy. Join
the Weblog World! -- Sheila Steele, March 20, 2005
Toronto
Police paid out $30M in secretly resolved claims over last five
years
|