|
Sandra Davis:
She wants the right to live with the family she chooses --
the one who has chosen her
I
am in Duntser BC and my dads name is cleared in the criminal
area but according to the ministry he is still dangerous and
they think he will hurt me, which he would never do. Thank you
for helping me, I don't really know how I can fight the ministry
right now except for going public with what they have put my
family and I through, if there is anything you need to know please
email me. Thanks again Sandra Davis
Update: March 5, 2004: I just
wanted to update you on the more recent things the ministry has
done and told my mom and I.
On March 4th my Social worker
and her supervisor phoned us and told us that yet again the director
has refused me on staying with my mom and if I do not cooperate
and move to another foster home (they said I would not have to
participate in any family activities or bond with the family)
then they would start the restraining order (time #3).
They said they could get the
restraining order on a balance of probability that something
did happen, and they could get it on my mom for "not believing
a offence took place" . Kemp the supervisor told my
mom that she should get legal council, mom told them that I wanted
a lawyer and asked them how I would go about getting one and
they told me through Legal Aid.
So I contacted Legal Aid and
I got refused to get a lawyer. My mom and I have already gone
to the MLA and Ombudsman and they both said that they could not
help me. I do not know were else to turn for help, my mom and
I have been given until Wednesday 10th to contact a lawyer and
make our decision on what to do. My mom and I are going to talk
to a judge, and we were also hoping that you would be able to
help us. As long as my parents and I have something to fight
with we are not backing down from the ministry. My mom and
I have also sent our story to various newspaper and we have not
received anything back form them yet regarding my story. All
this stress is killing us, we need help, please help us.
Hello my name is Sandra Davis
and I am 16 years old.
Two years ago my sister, Nicole
Roebuck, accused my Foster Dad of 11 years, Ben Davis, of sexual
assault. My brother and I went on to another foster home while
my sister went to go stay with her boyfriend.
Years have past, my brother
went on to independent living at the age of 17 and I went on
to two other foster homes and neither of those homes being the
one I truly wanted to be in.
The charges against my Dad
have been stayed. It took two years before crown council, Jason
LeBlond looked at it and it went to a preliminary hearing. After
the preliminary hearing crown council asked for extra time to
review the case and then threw it out because the prosecutor's
witnesses lacked credibility.
I am thrilled because I never
believed it happened in the first place and I wanted to go live
with him and my mom again. I have left the ministry on my own
and I am now currently living were I truly feel safe and wanted,
at my original foster parents house who I have grown to love
and they are my family.
But the ministry wants to take
me away from them because they are using the old charges against
my Dad. I knew my Dad would never do what he was accused of and
would never think of hurting one of his children or anybody for
that matter.
Apparently I don't know what
is right for me and I don't know what I really want, according
to the ministry. In these two years they have never listened
to what I wanted or what my feelings were on this matter but
all of a sudden they decide that I don't really know what I want
and they are trying to take me from my home again.
The Ministry are threatening
my parents and saying that they are going to put a restraining
order on them so I won't be able to see them. I thought when
I reached 16 I would have more say but apparently they're going
to be doing this stuff to me and trying to protect their jobs
instead of acting upon what I want and my well being until I
am 19. My Mom, Dad and myself have all told the ministry of our
wish to adopt me, but they are not going to let this happen.
I am convinced this has nothing to do what I want it is only
to protect their jobs. This somehow has something to do with
"the best interest of the child?" This is a very brief
outline of all they have put us through, and what I am asking
for is help in going public with my story.
The reason I want to go live
with my old foster parents and not my biological parents is because
I have been in this same foster home for 11 years and these people
are my family, and the only family I know.
from Sandra's uncle
My name is Chris
Mennie and I am a brother in law of Ben Davis and have known
Sandra and her two siblings since they were directed to the Davis
household.
Not because of our relationship but because
of our friendship, I have never believed Ben Davis guilty of
any wrong doing. Nicole had her day in court and Sandra has explained
what occurred there. Nicole is now carrying on with her life
as is their brother Steve. If Nicole and Steve are allowed to
carry on then I believe Sandra should be given the same consideration.
I am not some type of know it all authority
about the social service Ministry. I do not think that I could
do their job and I do not want to do their job. I do however,
point out the same thing that Sandra does and that is that all
of this has been done in the best interest of the child/ward
of the Ministry. I was at the preliminary hearing and waited
along with the rest of the family for the news that the charges
were dropped. Since that time, Ben Davis has gone to the RCMP
and had his record expunged and there is no criminal charges
against him, pending or otherwise. This being the case, what
are Sandra's rights in regards to her wishes of being re-united
with the people she knows as Mom and Dad? A Dad who was not convicted
of a criminal charge there-fore should he not enjoy the rights
of a free citizen?
I made a statement to my wife, Bens sister,
when the accusations were first made, that the damage to Bens
reputation was already done and may never be overcome. Just the
allegation ruins most peoples life's, regardless of guilt
or in this instance, innocence. Since Ben has been cleared of
all charges, does this mean he is innocent? If Sandra is not
allowed back into the home and family of her choosing, does this
mean that the Ministry still considers Ben to be guilty? If this
is the case then something is very wrong in my opinion. If this
is not the case then is there something personal happening here?
These are just a few questions that I have
and believe me there are many more. I stand behind Ben Davis
and Sandra and will assist them as best as I can. I think that
Sandra needs your assistance to bring this to the forefront within your
sphere of influence.
Chris Mennie
|
Truth can never be told so as to be understood,
and not be believ'd. William
Blake, The
Proverbs of Hell
Truth suppress'd, whether by courts or crooks,
will find an avenue to be told. Sheila Steele, injusticebusters.com
Who
we are:
Publisher Sheila
Steele
Got something
to say about this or any other stories on this site? Go to injusticebustersblog Participate!
Another target of
Dueck's malice:
Wilf
Hathway
Our activism
contributed greatly to the good vibes which happened around the
civil trial.
Please participate
by posting your own photos and links of activism in your community.
Index
to the stories on this website
This is not regularly
updated so if you are looking for a particular story and you
have a name or keyword, please use the site search engine(at
the bottom of the page) which IS regularly updated
Index to Saskatoon Police stories
This is a pretty good scrapbook
for the 1998-2002 period.
Hatchen and Munson: These two drove
Darrell Night to the edge of Saskatoon
on a freezing January night in 2000. They were found guilty of
unlawful confinement, did some time and are acknowledged by the
Saskatoon Police Service for each having served for 17 years.
The Police Association stood by them and paid for their defence
until they were convicted. Only then were they fired.
- An incredible, long series on abusive cops in
the Seattle Post-Intelligence
-
- Washington Post series on false confessions
-
-
- Ontario: Dylan
Chochla
- Keigo
Glen White
- John Chalmers
-
-
- "Expert" testimony
- Reid
Technique
- Clayton Johnson
- Monique Turenne
- James
Driskell
- Vancouver
police
- Winnipeg
police
Canadians who have
been wrongfully convicted because of improper investigations
combined with zealous Crown
- Robert
Baltovich
- Sebastian Burns
- Jason
Dix
- Jim
Driskell
- Jody
Druken
- Randy
Druken
- Michel Dumont
- Walter
Gillespie and Robert Mailman
- Clayton Johnson
- Yvonne Johnson
- Herman
Kaglik
| Kulaveeringsam
"Kulam" Karthiresu
- Donald Marshall |Chris McCullough
- Michael
McTaggart
- Felix
Michaud
- David Milgaard
- Guy
Paul Morin
- Shannon
Murrin
- Jamie
Nelson
- Greg
Parsons
- Rafay, Atif
- Louise
Reynolds
- Thomas
Sophonow
- Gary
Staples
- Steven
Truscott
- Joe
Warren
- Leon
Walchuk
-
- AIDWYC
- Innocence Project (Canada)
- Innocence Project (U.S.)
- Northwest Law Center on Wrongful Convictions
-
- NEW: Kirstin
Lobato
- Jeffrey
Scott Hornoff
- Willie
Upshaw
- Hurricane
Carter
- Guildford
4
- Birmingham
6
- Amirault
- Houston
- More U.S. wrongful convictions:
- Peter
Rose
- Clifford
St. Joseph
- John
Stoll
- Ludrate
Burton
- Albert
Johnson
- Stephen
Cowans
- Laurence
Adams
- Peter
Reilly
- Marty
Tankleff |
-
- Nfld Defamation story:
- Wanda
Young
- Racism
in the Federal Civil Service
|